Click here to get in touch with a licensed OPMC Attorney

PD 051110

CASE ANALYSIS SUMMARY Summary: A physician entered into a consent agreement on 05/11/2010 after not contesting a charge of being disciplined by the Connecticut State Medical Examining Board. The Connecticut discipline involved prescribing controlled substances to family members without maintaining accurate patient records and failing to keep an inventory of controlled substances in the office. …

WD 071410

CASE ANALYSIS SUMMARY Summary: This physician entered into a consent agreement on 07/14/2010 after admitting to a criminal conviction for misbranding of a drug held for resale after shipment in interstate commerce. The provider received a two-year license suspension (stayed) with three years of probation. All terms of the order were completed on March 13, …

M. A. 091813

Summary This case involves a physician who voluntarily surrendered their New York medical license following disciplinary action taken by Illinois authorities. The physician had been indefinitely suspended in Illinois in October 2012 for fraudulent Medicaid billing practices, including submitting claims for Tramadol prescriptions without a legitimate medical purpose and for office visits that were not …

D. A. 082313

Summary This case involves a physician who entered into a consent agreement with the New York State Board for Professional Medical Conduct following disciplinary action by the Maryland State Board of Physicians. The physician was found guilty of professional misconduct in Maryland related to inappropriate prescribing practices, inadequate record-keeping, and failure to properly evaluate patients …

J. A. 052313

Summary This case involves a physician who voluntarily surrendered his New York medical license following disciplinary action taken against him by the Virginia Board of Medicine. The underlying Virginia case involved serious prescribing violations affecting seven patients over nearly a decade, including prescribing controlled substances without proper medical justification, inadequate patient evaluations, and poor record-keeping. …

D. A. 031313

Summary This case involves a physician who entered into a consent agreement with the New York State Board for Professional Medical Conduct following disciplinary action taken against him in New Jersey. The doctor was originally disciplined in New Jersey for improperly prescribing controlled substances to ten patients and was subsequently charged in New York under …

S. A. 011013

This case involves a Registered Physician Assistant who entered into a consent agreement with the New York State Board for Professional Medical Conduct in January 2013. The physician assistant was charged with one specification of professional misconduct for practicing beyond the authorized scope of the profession by inappropriately prescribing medications during 2009-2010. Rather than contest …

V. A. 111612

SUMMARY This case involved a physician who had their New York medical license revoked following a federal money laundering conviction and voluntary surrender of their Florida medical license due to inappropriate prescribing practices. The physician was found guilty of conspiracy to commit money laundering and had prescribed excessive amounts of controlled substances (Roxicodone and Lorazepam) …

A.D. 122612

Summary A physician’s New York medical license was revoked based on disciplinary action taken by Virginia’s medical board. The doctor had entered into a consent agreement in Virginia regarding controlled substance violations, but subsequently violated the terms of that agreement. The Virginia Board ultimately suspended the physician’s license indefinitely, and New York followed suit by …

F. A. 082712

CASE ANALYSIS SUMMARY Bottom Line: This case involved a physician who entered into a consent agreement regarding the inappropriate prescribing of controlled substances (including narcotics) to two patients over two years. Rather than contest the charges, the physician agreed to a 36-month probation with extensive monitoring requirements, including mandatory practice supervision by an approved physician …

Not to be used as legal advice. Not to be used as a source of legal guidance.