Click here to get in touch with a licensed OPMC Attorney

RC 071410

CASE SUMMARY A physician received censure and reprimand from the New York State Department of Health, effective July 14, 2010, after failing to maintain accurate records. The physician did not contest the charge, resulting in a negotiated resolution. All terms of the disciplinary order were satisfied by December 28, 2010, demonstrating prompt compliance and full …

SB 070910

Case Summary: This is a 2010 disciplinary case involving a physician who faced multiple serious charges related to patient care and professional conduct. An MD practicing in Brooklyn was charged with seven violations, including gross negligence, negligence on more than one occasion, fraudulent practice, filing a false report, ordering excessive tests and treatment, failure to …

B. B. 070314

Summary: The physician’s license was revoked after a Hearing Committee found the physician guilty of multiple serious charges, including violating a previous disciplinary order, maintaining inaccurate patient records, making false reports, fraudulent practice, and conduct evidencing moral unfitness. Effective Date: 07/03/2014 Type of Doctor: MD (Medical Doctor) Disposition Type: Hearing Committee decision (contested case) How …

D. A. 082313

Summary This case involves a physician who entered into a consent agreement with the New York State Board for Professional Medical Conduct following disciplinary action by the Maryland State Board of Physicians. The physician was found guilty of professional misconduct in Maryland related to inappropriate prescribing practices, inadequate record-keeping, and failure to properly evaluate patients …

A. J. 081413

Summary This case involves a physician who voluntarily surrendered their medical license in New York State rather than contest allegations of professional misconduct. The doctor was charged with failing to maintain adequate patient records over a six-year period from 2004 to 2010, affecting multiple patients. The physician chose to surrender their license through a negotiated …

J. A. 052313

Summary This case involves a physician who voluntarily surrendered his New York medical license following disciplinary action taken against him by the Virginia Board of Medicine. The underlying Virginia case involved serious prescribing violations affecting seven patients over nearly a decade, including prescribing controlled substances without proper medical justification, inadequate patient evaluations, and poor record-keeping. …

S. A.112612

Summary This case involves a physician who voluntarily surrendered their New York medical license in November 2012 after being charged with two specifications of professional misconduct. The charges were based on disciplinary action taken by the California Medical Board in July 2012, which had revoked the physician’s California license (with a stayed revocation), imposed a …

T. A.100812

Summary This case involves a physician who faced professional misconduct charges related to the care of nine patients (labeled A through I) between 2006-2009. The physician was found guilty of negligence and failure to maintain adequate medical records across multiple patients, but was cleared of more serious charges like gross negligence, incompetence, fraud, and moral …

M.A. 121411

CASE ANALYSIS SUMMARY Bottom Line: This case involved a physician who voluntarily surrendered their New York medical license rather than contest charges related to their Kentucky license revocation. The physician had been disciplined in Kentucky for failing to properly diagnose and monitor 11 patients, maintaining substandard medical records, and refusing to participate in rehabilitation proceedings. …

P. A. 110110

Summary This case involved a urologist who was found guilty of professional misconduct for failing to maintain accurate medical records. The physician copied vital signs, temperature, weight, and pupil evaluation results from a patient’s chart rather than conducting proper examinations during visits in October and November 2008. The doctor was censured and reprimanded, received a …

Not to be used as legal advice. Not to be used as a source of legal guidance.