Click here to get in touch with a licensed OPMC Attorney

KC 071910

CASE SUMMARY

A physician whose medical license was originally revoked on July 31, 2002, had that revocation stayed by the New York State Board of Regents on July 19, 2010, with probation imposed for three years instead. The Hearing Committee had previously sustained six serious charges against the physician: gross negligence, negligence on more than one occasion, practicing fraudulently, filing a false report, failing to comply with laws or regulations governing the practice of medicine, and engaging in conduct evidencing moral unfitness. During the probationary period, the physician may only practice medicine within an institutional or group setting under the onsite supervision of a licensed physician.


CASE ANALYSIS

Effective Date: 07/19/2010 (Stay of 2002 Revocation)

Type of Doctor: MD (Medical Doctor)

Disposition Type: License Revocation (Stayed) with Probation for 3 years

How many total charges? 6 charges

What specifications of charges were alleged?

    1. Gross negligence
    2. Negligence on more than one occasion
    3. Practicing fraudulently
    4. Filing a false report
    5. Failing to comply with laws or regulations governing the practice of medicine
    6. Engaging in conduct that evidences moral unfitness

How many patients were involved in each charge? Not specified in the available record (multiple charges suggest multiple patients)

Which charges was the licensee guilty of (either via hearing or negotiated consent)?

    • Gross negligence (sustained by Hearing Committee)
    • Negligence on more than one occasion (sustained by Hearing Committee)
    • Practicing fraudulently (sustained by Hearing Committee)
    • Filing a false report (sustained by Hearing Committee)
    • Failing to comply with laws or regulations (sustained by Hearing Committee)
    • Engaging in conduct evidencing moral unfitness (sustained by Hearing Committee)

Which charges was the licensee not guilty of? None – All six charges were sustained by the Hearing Committee

Outcome/Penalties (specific to this case):

Not to be used as legal advice. Not to be used as a source of legal guidance.